Jump to content

Disability in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

People with disabilities in the United States are a significant minority group, making up a fifth of the overall population and over half of Americans older than eighty.[1][2] There is a complex history underlying the U.S. and its relationship with its disabled population, with great progress being made in the last century to improve the livelihood of disabled citizens through legislation providing protections and benefits.[3] Most notably, the Americans with Disabilities Act is a comprehensive anti-discrimination policy that works to protect Americans with disabilities in public settings and the workplace.[1]

Definitions

[edit]
Further information: Disability

According to the Social Security Advisory Board, when the federal government first began provisioning funds for state-run disability assistance programs, eligible beneficiaries were defined as needing to be "totally and permanently disabled".[4] In 1956, this definition was expanded by the Disability Insurance Program to describe disability as the "inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or to be of long-continued and indefinite duration."[4] Critics indicated that this language limited the concept of disability to an occupational scope, and more holistic definitions were adopted as time passed.[5] The modern consensus on disability within governmental, medical, sociological realms in the United States is that it includes impairments that either physically or mentally incapacitate individuals from engaging in significant life activities, or the perception of possessing such an impairment.[6][7] For instance, in a 2013 study, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) evaluated disability across five dimensions: vision, cognition, mobility, self-care, and independent living.[8] Specific conditions that fall under this umbrella vary circumstantially, however it is broadly accepted that disability includes, but is not limited to the following:[5][6]

History

[edit]
Further information: Timeline of disability rights in the United States

At a federal level, legislation pertaining to disability was limited in the 18th and 19th centuries, with notable laws at that time including an act for the relief of sick and disabled seamen, which was signed by John Adams in 1798.[3] In the early 1900s eugenic sterilization laws were passed in several states, permitting governments to conduct forced sterilization on individuals with mental disorders.[3] The 1927 Supreme Court case Buck v Bell upheld the constitutionality of such legislation, with such laws being banned nearly half a century later with the 1978 Federal Sterilization Legislation, although loopholes have been exploited with such sterilizations continuing into modern times.[3] The burgeoning of disability rights legislation in the 1900s came after World War I with congress' establishment of the Rehabilitation Programs, which provided education and healthcare support to recovering veterans.[3] Significant progress came in the 1930s with the presidential election of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was physically disabled himself, and his signage of the Social Security Act.[3][9]

One of the first prominent groups that formed together to advocate for Disability Rights in America, was the League of the Physically Handicapped. The League of the Physically Handicapped was organized in the early 1930s. This group was very outspoken against Franklin D. Roosevelt, and about how disabled people were being discriminated against in the workplace. As a result, The League of the Physically Handicapped were targeted by the Roosevelt administration.[10] More progress towards disability justice came in hand with the civil rights movement in the latter half of the 20th century.[3] In 1961 the American National Standards Institute published a document overviewing building accessibility limitations for physically disabled individuals, which supported the passage of the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 and encouraged several states to adopt inclusive accessibility legislation in the '70s.[3] Additionally in the 1960s, Medicaid and the Mental Retardation Facilities and Community Mental Health Centers Construction Act were passed, allocating funds towards healthcare and the developments of statewide councils, advocacy frameworks, and post-secondary education pathways for disabled citizens.[3][9] In the 1970s major anti-discrimination legislation was enacted with the repeal of the last "Ugly law", which permitted law enforcement to incarcerate people for appearing disabled, as well as the 1973 Rehabilitation Act and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) which prevented institutions that received public funding from discriminating on disability status.[3][9] The 1980s oversaw saw an additional movement towards accessibility with the passage of the Air Carrier Access Act, Fair Housing Amendments Act, and Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act and justice with the creation of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA).[9]

In 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) served as a landmark bill outlining more comprehensive protections and accommodations for the disabled community, with other legislation, introduced later that decade such as the 1996 Telecommunications Act and the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act (TWWIIA) expanding upon the ADA.[9] The turn of the Millennium oversaw crucial Supreme Court cases such as Olmstead v. L.C. and Tennessee v. Lane which upheld federally outlined disability rights.[11]

Demographics

[edit]

According to the Disability Status: 2019 - Census 2019 Brief approximately 20 percent of Americans have one or more diagnosed psychological or physical disability:

Census 2000 counted 49.7 million people with some type of long-lasting condition or disability. They represented 19.3 percent of the 257.2 million people who were aged 5 and older in the civilian non-institutionalized population – or nearly one person in five...[12]

This percentage varies depending on how disabilities are defined. It may be helpful to note that disability in the United States is classified under different types of physical or mental impairments of which include one's ability to physically function, mental status, including decision skills and memory, the ability of sight, if they are self-sufficient, and finally, if they depend on anyone to help them do tasks [citation needed]. According to Census Brief 97-5, "About 1 in 5 Americans have some kind of disability, and 1 in 10 have a severe disability. Not only does this statistic affect those who are disabled, but individuals with disabilities not only endure disadvantages but so do their children or possibly grandchildren as they can potentially be left facing health care disadvantages as well as education."[13]

The United States Census Bureau is legally charged with developing information on the type and prevalence of disability in the population. Statistics reveal the highest percentage of individuals with a disability reside in southern areas such as Texas, Florida, Mississippi, and anywhere along the southern coast. The states that include the fewest disabled individuals are western areas of which will include Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah. These disabled people are protected by three primary laws. They include the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.[14] The primary purpose of collecting ACS data on disability is to help the U.S. Congress determine the allocation of federal funds and inform policies.[15] It is also used to identify the characteristics of the disabled population of the United States.[16] Determining the number and geographical location of people with disabilities is crucial for policies aimed at providing services like public transportation.[17]

ACS does not directly measure disability[18] There are other smaller survey studies that provide some insight on disability in the U.S. While studies like the National Health Interview Survey[19] the Health and Retirement Study,[20] the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System,[21] and the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study[22] are used to infer valuable disability-related health characteristics in the U.S. population.[23][24][25] While responses to these items are commonly refer to as "disability", it could be argued the —it uses self- and proxy-reports to evaluate perceived ability to perform functional tasks. Existing publications have delineated details on the U.S. population regarding disability by using information from the ACS.[26][27][28] Publications have also outlined issues with disability data in the ACS.[29][30][31][32] Research on disability continues to improve,[33][34] and potential remedies are found for current methodological challenges.[35][36] Because of the uniqueness, regarding federal funding and policy, researchers from various fields (e.g., sociology, epidemiology, and government) make wide use of ACS data to better understand disability in the U.S.[37]

African Americans

[edit]

According to the 2000 U.S. Census, the African American community has the highest rate of disability in the United States at 20.8 percent, slightly higher than the overall disability rate of 19.4 percent.[38] Given these statistics, it can be suggested that African Americans with disabilities experience the most severe underemployment, unemployment, and under-education compared to other disability groups.[39] For instance, the 2015 American Community Survey indicates that African Americans who have disabilities live in poverty at a rate of 1.5 to 2 times greater than other racial groups in America.[40]

Criminal justice

[edit]

Data obtained in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth indicates that Black men with disabilities encounter the greatest cumulative probability of being arrested by age 28, in contrast to others with either different gender, disability, or race status.[41] With respect to African American women re-entering society after serving time, a JHCPCU article identified disability, more specifically positive HIV/HCV status, as a major factor correlated with lowered usage of various modes of health care such as alternative and emergency care.[42] Calls for civil rights and criminal justice reform with the Black Lives Matter movement have brought into public eye how Black individuals with disabilities disproportionately experience police violence.[43][44] Instances cited as police brutality, such as the 2018 killing of Marcus-David Peters, an unarmed black man experiencing a mental health crisis, has motivated legislation such as Virginia's Mental Health Awareness Response and Community Understanding Services (MARCUS) alert bill, which would necessitate that cases of individual mental distress be attended to by both police and mental health professionals.[45] Viral footage of the killing of Walter Wallace, a black man with a history of mental illness who was killed during a police encounter, has helped bring the Black Disabled Lives Matter movement into the public eye.[46][47][48]

Education

[edit]

Work published in the Journal of African American History suggest that the enduring consequences of segregation and separation of special education classrooms can potential have a negative compound effect on the quality of education for African American students with disabilities.[49] An article in the Harvard Educational Review suggests that educational pedagogy designed to "cross-pollinate" across race and disability coalitions is an effective way to combat exclusion that particularly impacts Black disabled children.[50]

Employment

[edit]

According to a study published in the Journal of Disability Policy, Black people with disabilities experience significantly higher unemployment and lower monthly wages compared to the overall disabled community and general population.[51] A research paper in the Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling reported that counseling professionals identified that disability status can limit employment prospects of Black and Latino offenders seeking work opportunities.[52]

Healthcare

[edit]

Disabled Black Americans face barriers to receiving comprehensive medical care to address their pre-existing health conditions.[53][54] In studies published in the Journals of Applied Gerontology it was noted that elderly African American women face a greater likelihood of acquiring disability in comparison their white counterparts, and additionally are more likely to rely on medicaid for coverage.[53][54] The same journal articles established a correlation between being uninsured or utilizing medicaid coverage with greater levels of disability.[54] With respect to disabled youth, it was found that when controlling for socioeconomic and insurance status, Hispanic and Black children with disabilities were less likely to have received specialty medical care in comparison to children from other racial backgrounds according to research published in the journal PEDIATRICS.[55]

Disparities

[edit]

Discrimination in employment

[edit]
Further information: Employment discrimination

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 requires all organizations that receive government funding to provide accessibility programs and services. A more recent law, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which came into effect in 1992, prohibits private employers, state and local governments, employment agencies, and labor unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing, advancement, compensation, job training, or in the terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. This includes organizations like retail businesses, movie theaters, and restaurants. They must make reasonable accommodation to people with different needs. Protection is extended to anyone with (A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of an individual, (B) a record of such an impairment, or (C) being regarded as having such an impairment. The second and third criteria are seen as ensuring protection from unjust discrimination based on a perception of risk, just because someone has a record of impairment or appears to have a disability or illness (e.g. features which may be erroneously taken as signs of an illness). Employment protection laws make discrimination against qualified individuals with a disability illegal and may also require the provision of reasonable accommodation.[56] Reasonable accommodations includes changes in the physical environment like making facilities more accessible but also include increasing job flexibility like job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules or reassignment to vacant position. Though many hold attitudes that are more enlightened and informed than past years, the word "disability" carries few positive connotations for most employers. Negative attitudes by employers toward potential employees with disabilities can lead to misunderstanding and discrimination.[57]

Healthcare disparities

[edit]

The disability paradox, a concept that recognizes the tendency for individuals without disabilities to perceive their disabled counterparts as having poorer livelihoods than disabled individuals would view themselves, is perpetuated in healthcare settings, with research published in the Handbook of Disability Studies identifying that practitioners award lower quality of life scores to disabled individuals than a member of the general population would.[58] An article in the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal expresses that as a consequence physicians frequently go into consults with rigid, skewed perceptions of their patient's disabilities.[59] Anita Ho, a bioethicist, argues that heightened practitioner confidence can harmfully impact disabled individuals in this regard as it increases the likelihood that patients may distrust their physicians or conversely place excessive faith in their care provider's insight into their condition.[60] Disparate in healthcare access also impact disabled populations, for instance, most rural areas — especially in the Great Plains region — have little or no government-organized medical support infrastructure for the permanently disabled indigent population which results in disability in the United States not only affecting individuals physically and mentally but socioeconomically as well.[61]

Poverty

[edit]
Further information: Poverty in the United States

Investigations on the "poverty and disability nexus" [62][63][64][65] have consistently shown poverty and disability are correlated for all race-ethnic groups within the United States. Financial stability of people with disabilities would decrease the dependence on governmental support programs.[66][67][68][69] Studies have been done with the U.S. Census Bureau data to examine the high prevalence of disabilities among welfare recipients.[70] Thirteen percent of families with children under the age of 18, who are also receiving welfare benefits, had at least one child with a disability.[70] Families with income below twice the poverty line were 50 percent more likely to have a child with a disability than those families with higher incomes.[70] Children with disabilities from families with annual household incomes of higher than $50,000 were more likely to attend higher education.[71]

Research suggests higher education does impact employment and income opportunities for people with disabilities.[66][72][73][74] It is also noted near equivocal employment opportunities and salaries for people with disabilities to their peers without disabilities.[72][75] While only one-fifth of people in the U.S. have at least a four-year college degree, some studies note possessing a four-year degree is the difference between absolute job security and joblessness.[72][75]

Public resources

[edit]

Social Security Administration

[edit]

The Social Security Administration (SSA), defines disability in terms of an individual's inability to perform substantial gainful activity (SGA), by which it means "work paying minimum wage or better". The agency pairs SGA with a list of medical conditions that qualify individuals for disability benefits. Individuals who are disabled will receive insurance and this ensures they will always be getting paid when they must take time off work or cannot work due to the severity of their illness. The SSDI and the SSI are both social security programs that will assist in payments.

The SSA makes available to disabled Americans two forms of disability benefits: Social Security Disability Insurance, (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Briefly, the SSDI is a program that is useful in the sense that it is like welfare, but you must have been able to work enough hours throughout your life and you must have paid social security taxes in order to be approved. This benefit is most useful for those who do not have severe disabilities or illnesses because those who are immobile will not have been able to work. The good thing about this benefit does not only do it benefit the individual, but it will benefit their family members as well. To go more in-depth, Social Security pays disability benefits to citizens who have worked long enough and have a medical condition that has prevented them from working or is expected to prevent them from working for at least 12 months or end in death. Looking at the SSI, the SSI insurance, or the Social Security Insurance program, is there to pay individual benefits who could not have worked or have little capital. However, for both of these insurances, the same approval is required by the individual's disability. [76]

Some assistance ends if the beneficiary starts working. If that assistance (such as personal care or transportation) is necessary for work, it creates a welfare trap where it is not possible to work despite potentially being willing and able.[77] Some programs do provide incentives to work.[78]

Education

[edit]

K-12

[edit]

Before the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act was passed, children with disabilities were at-risk of not receiving a free, appropriate public education, but each act protecting the disabled individuals protects different criteria of which include differentiation in schools, the law by which schools must be up to date on the K-12 act, and equal service for the public who extend any services. For IDEA to apply, the child must first be determined to be able to benefit from public education. This benefit is not exclusively limited to school-aged children but applies to children with disabilities from infancy.

Due to the societal stigma of disability, children are sometimes treated like disabled children, and not included in activities in which other children were able to participate. However, for These individuals with any type of disablement such as learning disabilities or physical disabilities, the Americans with Disabilities Act covers them. This act ensures no one is discriminated against beyond their own home of which includes work, school, and anywhere in public. The places it does not cover will include sanctioned or private areas including one's home.[79] Educators can hold students with disabilities to lower expectations, which impacts their future educational attainment. Although their future may be impaired the K-12 act is broad amongst education and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act will help clarify. This act ensures individuals who attended schools, play on school sports teams, or attend any off or on-campus events will be protected unless that school is not funded by the government. These students must be given compromises that other students may not receive due to their impairments.[80]

Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the school district must provide every disabled child with an Individualized Education Plan (IEP). The IEP is compiled by a team of school administrators and guardians and may include a child advocate, counselors, occupational therapists, or other specialists. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ensures all fees for schooling are discharged, but these children must be approved under IDEA and must be in a certain category of disabilities. This act allows for any student or child to be assessed and is provided extra incentives that may apply to their condition. The IEP also evaluates the goals for the child and determines what needs to be done in order for those goals to be met.[81] Children with disabilities who do not have a parent or guardian advocating on their behalf are not as well served in the education system as their peers with parent or guardian advocates.[80][82]

Transition preparation from K-12 education to post-secondary education or career was initially written into IDEA to begin at age 12, but in the existing law, transition preparation does not begin until age 16. While this law provides a maximum age at which to begin transition preparation, students with disabilities have been known to receive transition preparation at a younger age, as the states might mandate a younger age, or the IEP team might determine a younger age is appropriate to begin the transition preparation of the student.[83] Some students with disabilities have noted not receiving any transition preparation at all. The transition services are to be designed to be results-oriented rather than outcome-oriented. This is to ensure the transition services are designed for the student's success.[83] Students are intended to attend their transition planning meetings with the IEP, yet not all students do. Some do attend, yet generally not take a leadership role - only fourteen percent do.[83] This places the students with a disability in a passive role instead of an agentic role in their own life plans.[84] In a 2007 study of a higher education institution located in the Midwestern United States, it was found that one-third of students with disabilities felt their transition preparation was lacking. Many in this group were unaware of laws that pertained to disability and higher education.[85] This leaves them without an understanding of their learning needs and unable to advocate for themselves.

Higher Education

[edit]

Self-advocacy plays an important role in the success of students with disabilities in higher education.[71] While the examination of self-advocacy skills has been largely limited to the impact in academic settings, self-advocacy skills, or the lack thereof, do also impact non-academic situations. A 2004 study noted that only 3 percent of students with disabilities had self-advocacy training.[86] Students with disabilities who are confident about their disability identity and self-advocacy skills are more likely to disclose their disabilities and advocate for their needs when interacting with faculty and staff. Advocacy service is also provided to students as staff from different programs help instructors in college, understand the needs of disabled students who are attending their classes. So much so that when disable students need extra time to complete their course then some arrangements are made to accommodate such students.[87] Students with disabilities who were embarrassed of their disability identity and did not understand their needs as learners looked to faculty and staff for solutions to accommodation needs.[85] Education helps students with disabilities learn self-advocacy skills that affect their ability to advocate for their health, insurance, and other needs.[80]

In spite of IDEA and Section 504 providing support for the education of people with disabilities, the educational outcomes of people with disabilities vary significantly from the outcomes of people without disabilities.[80] After high school, a 2005 study found students with disabilities enroll in postsecondary education, whether college, technical school or vocational school, at a rate of 46 percent compared to the rate of 63 percent for students without disabilities.[80] This rate is up 23 percent since 1990, when the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 was passed.[80] Specifically to four-year degree-granting higher education institutions, 27 percent of students with disabilities attend compared to 54 percent of students without disabilities.[72] High school completion and postsecondary education enrollment vary per disability type.[80]

Students with disabilities are responsible for advocating for their accommodations and needs as learners in higher education environments. Many higher education institutions have staff to work with students with disabilities on their accommodation requests.[88] Higher education institutions do vary in process to obtain accommodations and accommodations provided.[88] The staff members at the higher education institutions can recommend accommodations. The faculty members, however, may choose to vary or not implement the accommodations at all based upon concerns of weakening the academic integrity of the course or risking the possibility of endless accommodation requests.[85][84] When working with faculty members about accommodations, nearly half of the students with disabilities recalled receiving a negative response, while the other half felt their faculty members were accommodating.[85][84]

For people with disabilities, having a four-year college degree provides significant employment and salary advantages.[72][89][90]

Employment and minimum wage exemption

[edit]

More than 56 million Americans are enrolled in Medicare.[91] Disabled citizens in the United States receive Medicare insurance and social security benefits to varying degrees. For those that seek employment for therapeutic or economic reasons, the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 is applicable. This act was an attempt to facilitate the large number of disabled servicemen returning from the front lines "to the extent necessary to prevent curtailment of opportunities for employment".[92] Section 14(c) provides the employers with a method of paying their disabled employees less than applicable federal minimum wage. The Secretary of Labor issues certificates that align wages with the employee's productivity.

As of 2012 there are 420,000 §14(c) employees being paid less than the minimum wage of $7.25 per hour.[93] Administratively, the wage for disabled people was informally set at 75 percent. Those working in sheltered work centers have no minimum floor for their wage. The Fair Wages for Workers with Disabilities Act was proposed in 2013 to repeal §14(c) but was not passed.

Insurance

[edit]

It is illegal for California insurers to refuse to provide car insurance to properly licensed drivers solely because they have a disability.[94] It is also illegal for them to refuse to provide car insurance "on the basis that the owner of the motor vehicle to be insured is blind",[95] but they are allowed to exclude coverage for injuries and damages incurred while a blind unlicensed owner is actually operating the vehicle (the law is apparently structured to allow blind people to buy and insure cars which their friends, family, and caretakers can drive for them).[94]

Policies and legislation

[edit]

The Department of Labor's 2014 rules for federal contractors, defined as companies that make more than $50,000/year from the federal government, required them to have as a goal that 7 percent of their workforce must be disabled people.[96] In schools, the ADA requires that all classrooms must be wheelchair accessible.[97] The U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, commonly known as the Access Board, created the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to help offer guidelines for transportation and accessibility for physically disabled people.[98]

About 12.6 percent of the U.S. population are individuals who have a mental or physical disability. Many are unemployed because of prejudiced assumptions that a person with disabilities is unable to complete tasks that are commonly required in the workforce. This became a major human rights issue because of the discrimination that this group faced when trying to apply for jobs in the U.S. Many advocacy groups protested against such discrimination, asking the federal government to implement laws and policies that would help individuals with disabilities.

Rehabilitation Act of 1973

[edit]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was enacted with the purpose of protecting individuals with disabilities from prejudicial treatment by government-funded programs, employers, and agencies. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 has not only helped protect U.S. citizens from being discriminated against but it has also created confidence amongst individuals to feel more comfortable with their disability. There are many sections within The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, that contains detailed information about what is covered in this policy.

Section 501
An employer must hire an individual who meets the qualifications of a job description despite any preexisting disabilities.
Section 503
Requires contractors or subcontractors, who receive more than $10,000 from the government to hire people with disabilities and to accommodate them with the needs that they need to achieve in the workforce.
Section 504
States that receive federal money may not discriminate against any person with disabilities who qualifies for a program or job.

On June 22, 1999, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in Olmstead vs. L. C. that said unjustified segregation of persons with disabilities constitutes discrimination in violation of title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.[citation needed][99] This has been interpreted as meaning people with disabilities must be given all opportunities by the government to stay in their own homes as opposed to assisted living, nursing homes or worse, institutions for disabled people. It has been interpreted as meaning the government must make all reasonable efforts to allow people with disabilities to be included in their respective communities and enjoy family and friends, work if possible, get married, own homes and interact with nondisabled people.[citation needed]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

[edit]

The federal government enacted the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which was created to allow equal opportunity for jobs, access to private and government-funded facilities, and transportation for disabled people. This act was created with the purpose to ensure that employers would not discriminate against any individual despite their disability. In 1990, data was gathered to show the percentage of disabled people who worked in the U.S. Out of the 13 percent who filled out the survey, only 53 percent of individuals with disabilities worked while 90 percent of this group population did not, the government wanted to change this, they wanted Americans with disabilities to have the same opportunities as those who did not have a disability. The ADA required corporations to not only hire qualified disabled people but also accommodate them and their needs.

Title I
Employment
An employer must give a qualified individual with disabilities the same opportunities as any other employee despite their disability. The employer must offer equal work privileges to someone who has a disability including but not limited to pay, work hours, training, etc. The employer must also create accommodations suitable for the person and their physical or mental disabilities.
Title II
State and Local Government Activities
Requires that the government give disabled people the same opportunities involving work, programs, building access, and services. Title II also requires that buildings create easy access for disabled people and provide communicators who will be able to help those with hearing or speaking impairments. Public spaces are however not required to create accommodations that would, in turn, alter their services as long as the services proved that they did all they could to prevent discrimination against disabled people.
Title II
Transportation
Public transportation should be customized so that disabled people may have easy access to public transit. Paratransit is a service that provides transportation to people who are unable to get from one destination to another due to their mental or physical disability.
Title III
Public Accommodations
Public accommodations require that private businesses create accommodations that will allow disabled people easy access to buildings. Private businesses may not discriminate against disabled people and must provide accommodations that are reasonable, alterations may be made so that a person with disabilities can have equal access to facilities that are provided, communicators for the hearing impaired, devices for the visually impaired, and wheelchair access. Facilities must regulate with the ADA, when regulating the building's infrastructure so it meets the ADA regulations.
Title IV
Telecommunication Relay Services
Requires telephone companies to have TRS seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day. It requires telephone companies to create accommodations for deaf and hard-of-hearing people by providing a third party able to assist both parties in communicating with one another.

Disability culture

[edit]

Media

[edit]

The National Center on Disability and Journalism (NCDJ) provides resources and support to journalists and communications professionals covering disability issues. The center is headquartered at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University.

Arts

[edit]

There are many government initiatives that support the participation of people with disabilities in arts and cultural programs. Most U.S. state governments include an accessibility coordinator with their state arts agency or regional arts organization. There are a variety of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and non-profit groups that support initiatives for inclusive arts and culture.

The development of disability arts in the U.S. is also tied to several non-profit organizations such as Creative Growth in Oakland, California, that serves adult artists with developmental, mental and physical disabilities, providing a professional studio environment for artistic development, gallery exhibition and representation and a social atmosphere among peers.[101] Organizations with similar mandates in the Bay Area include Creativity Explored in San Francisco, and NIAD Art Center in Richmond, California.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Gostin, Lawrence O. (2015-06-09). "The Americans With Disabilities Act at 25: The Highest Expression of American Values". JAMA. 313 (22): 2231–5. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.6405. ISSN 0098-7484. PMID 26057283.
  2. ^ Andresen, E. M.; Fitch, C. A.; McLendon, P. M.; Meyers, A. R. (August 2000). "Reliability and validity of disability questions for US Census 2000". American Journal of Public Health. 90 (8): 1297–1299. doi:10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1297. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 1446332. PMID 10937013.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Charlton, James I. (1998). Nothing about us without us : disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-92544-1. OCLC 42417786.
  4. ^ a b The Social Security Definition of Disability Social Security Advisory Board. Washington, D.C: Social Security Advisory Board. 2003.
  5. ^ a b DONOGHUE, CHRISTOPHER (March 2003). "Challenging the Authority of the Medical Definition of Disability: An analysis of the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm". Disability & Society. 18 (2): 199–208. doi:10.1080/0968759032000052833. ISSN 0968-7599. S2CID 143000491.
  6. ^ a b Francis, L.; Silvers, A. (2016-10-01). "Perspectives on the Meaning of "Disability"". AMA Journal of Ethics. 18 (10): 1025–1033. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.10.pfor2-1610. ISSN 2376-6980. PMID 27780027.
  7. ^ Bloch, Frank S. (January 2007). "Medical Proof, Social Policy, and Social Security's Medically Centered Definition of Disability". Cornell Law Review. 2: 189.
  8. ^ "Prevalence of Disability and Disability Type Among Adults — United States, 2013". www.cdc.gov. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  9. ^ a b c d e Burkhauser, Richard V; Daly, Mary C (2002-02-01). "Policy Watch: U.S. Disability Policy in a Changing Environment". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 16 (1): 213–224. doi:10.1257/0895330027067. ISSN 0895-3309. PMID 15179975.
  10. ^ Paul K. Longmore, "The League of the Physically Handicapped and the Great Depression: A Case Study in the New Disability History," The Journal of American History, vol. 87, no. 3 (Dec. 2000).
  11. ^ Wilson, Daniel J. (2017). "A Disability History of the United States by Kim E. Nielsen". African American Review. 50 (2): 241–242. doi:10.1353/afa.2017.0026. ISSN 1945-6182. S2CID 164784065.
  12. ^ Disability Status: 2019 - Census 20002019 Brief (PDF) (Report). US Census Bureau. March 2003.
  13. ^ Disabilities Affect One-Fifth of All Americans (PDF). Census Brief (Report). US Census Bureau. December 1997.
  14. ^ Siordia C (2014). "Proxy-Reports in the Ascertainment of Disability Prevalence with American Community Survey Data". The Journal of Frailty & Aging. 3 (4): 238–46. doi:10.14283/jfa.2014.31. PMID 27048864.
  15. ^ U. S. Census Bureau (2009), A Compass for Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What PUMS Data Users Need to Know (PDF), Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
  16. ^ Brault MW (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010 (Report). US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau. pp. P70 – P131.
  17. ^ Brucker DL, Houtenville AJ (May 2015). "People with disabilities in the United States". Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 96 (5): 771–4. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.024. PMID 25757791.
  18. ^ von Reichert C, Greiman L, Myers A (2014). "The Geography of Disability in America: On Rural-Urban Differences in Impairment Rates" (pdf). Independent Living and Community Participation (Paper 7). University of Montana Rural Institute. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. ^ "National Health Interview Survey". CDC.gov. Retrieved 2015-07-28.
  20. ^ "Health and Retirement Study". Umich.edu. Retrieved 2015-07-28.
  21. ^ "Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System". CDC.gov. Retrieved 2015-07-28.
  22. ^ "National Institute on Aging, Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry". Grc.nia.nih.gov. 2012-05-17. Archived from the original on 2016-04-17. Retrieved 2015-08-04.
  23. ^ Siordia C (8 August 2014). "Number of people in the United States experiencing ambulatory and independent living difficulties". Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation. 13 (3): 261–77. doi:10.1080/1536710X.2014.912187. PMC 4127098. PMID 24816336.
  24. ^ Siordia C (September 2015). "Disability Prevalence According to a Class, Race, and Sex (CSR) Hypothesis". Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2 (3): 303–10. doi:10.1007/s40615-014-0073-8. PMC 4628829. PMID 26539340.
  25. ^ Siordia C (2014). "Precision in Estimates of Disability Prevalence for the Population Aged 65 and Over in the United States by Race and Ethnicity". The Journal of Frailty & Aging. 3 (3): 187–92. doi:10.14283/jfa.2014.22. PMC 4527658. PMID 26258112.
  26. ^ Siordia C (March 2015). "Disability Estimates between Same- and Different-Sex Couples: Microdata from the American Community Survey (2009-2011)". Sexuality and Disability. 33 (1): 107–121. doi:10.1007/s11195-014-9364-6. PMC 4346217. PMID 25745275.
  27. ^ Burkhauser RV (2014). "Capturing the Elusive Working-Age Population With Disabilities Reconciling Conflicting Social Success Estimates From the Current Population Survey and American Community Survey". Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 24 (4): 195–205. doi:10.1177/1044207312446226. S2CID 145369420.
  28. ^ Siordia C (14 April 2014). "Married Once, Twice, and Three or More Times: Data From the American Community Survey". Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 55 (3): 206–215. doi:10.1080/10502556.2014.887377. S2CID 143691558.
  29. ^ Siordia C, Le VD (25 March 2013). "Precision of Disability Estimates for Southeast Asians in the American Community Survey 2008-2010 Microdata". Central Asian Journal of Global Health. 2 (1): 40. doi:10.5195/cajgh.2013.40. PMC 5927763. PMID 29755872.
  30. ^ Citro CF, Kalton G, eds. (2007). Using the American Community Survey: benefits and challenges. National Academies Press.
  31. ^ Hough GC (2006). "An evaluation of the American Community Survey: results from the Oregon test site". Journal of Research and Policy Review. 25 (3): 257–273. doi:10.1007/s11113-006-0007-1. S2CID 154999189.
  32. ^ Siordia C, Young R (April 2013). "Methodological note: allocation of disability items in the American Community Survey". Disability and Health Journal. 6 (2): 149–53. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.11.007. PMID 23507166.
  33. ^ Brault MW (2012). "Americans with disabilities: 2010" (PDF). US Census Bureau: 70–131. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  34. ^ Singh GK, Lin SC (2013). "Marked ethnic, nativity, and socioeconomic disparities in disability and health insurance among US children and adults: the 2008-2010 American community survey". BioMed Research International. 2013: 627412. doi:10.1155/2013/627412. PMC 3819828. PMID 24232569.
  35. ^ Burkhauser RV, Houtenville AJ, Tennant JR (5 June 2012). "Capturing the Elusive Working-Age Population With Disabilities: Reconciling Conflicting Social Success Estimates From the Current Population Survey and American Community Survey". Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 24 (4): 195–205. doi:10.1177/1044207312446226. S2CID 145369420.
  36. ^ Maples JJ, Brault M (2014). "Improving Small Area Estimates of Disability: Combining the American Community Survey with the Survey of Income and Program Participation" (PDF). US Census Bureau. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  37. ^ Erickson W, Lee C, von Schrader S (2013). Disability Statistics from the 2011 American Community Survey (ACS). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI).
  38. ^ Americans with Disabilities in 2002 (PDF). Population Profile of the United States: Dynamic Version (Report). U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved June 19, 2013.
  39. ^ Alston RJ, Russo CJ, Miles AS (1994). "Brown v. Board of Education and the American with Disabilities Act: Vistas of equal educational opportunities for African Americans". Journal of Negro Education. 63 (3): 349. doi:10.2307/2967186. JSTOR 2967186.
  40. ^ Ward B, Myers A, Wong J, Ravesloot C (May 2017). "Disability Items From the Current Population Survey (2008-2015) and Permanent Versus Temporary Disability Status". American Journal of Public Health. 107 (5): 706–708. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303666. PMC 5388941. PMID 28323478.
  41. ^ McCauley, Erin J. (December 2017). "The Cumulative Probability of Arrest by Age 28 Years in the United States by Disability Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Gender". American Journal of Public Health. 107 (12): 1977–1981. doi:10.2105/ajph.2017.304095. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 5678390. PMID 29048954.
  42. ^ Oser, Carrie B.; Bunting, Amanda M.; Pullen, Erin; Stevens-Watkins, Danelle (2016). "African American Female Offender's Use of Alternative and Traditional Health Services After Re-Entry: Examining the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations". Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 27 (2A): 120–148. doi:10.1353/hpu.2016.0052. ISSN 1548-6869. PMC 4855295. PMID 27133515. S2CID 4822632.
  43. ^ Kim, Sarah (3 July 2020). "We Can't Erase Disability in the Black Lives Matter Movement". Teen Vogue. Retrieved 2020-10-28.
  44. ^ Vargas, Theresa. "Perspective | A young black autistic man was sentenced to 50 years for a car crash. Tens of thousands of people are now calling for his freedom". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2020-10-28.
  45. ^ Service, Andrew Ringle | Capital News. "House advances MARCUS alert bill". nbc12.com. Retrieved 2020-10-28.
  46. ^ "Statement from the Mayor's Commission on People with Disabilities Regarding the Death of Walter Wallace, Jr. | Mayor's Office for People with Disabilities". City of Philadelphia. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  47. ^ Levenson, Michael (2020-11-05). "Philadelphia Releases Body-Camera Video of Fatal Police Shooting of Black Man". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  48. ^ "Biden, Harris Express 'Shock and Grief' Over Police Shooting of Walter Wallace Jr". NBC10 Philadelphia. Retrieved 2020-11-17.
  49. ^ "Race, Disability, and Special Education", Encyclopedia of Disability, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2006, doi:10.4135/9781412950510.n665, ISBN 978-0-7619-2565-1, retrieved 2020-10-28
  50. ^ King Thorius, Kathleen A.; Waitoller, Federico R. (2017-06-01). "Strategic Coalitions Against Exclusion at the Intersection of Race and Disability—A Rejoinder". Harvard Educational Review. 87 (2): 251–257. doi:10.17763/1943-5045-87.2.251. ISSN 0017-8055.
  51. ^ Ozawa, Martha N.; Yeong Hun Yeo (December 2006). "Work Status and Work Performance of People With Disabilities". Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 17 (3): 180–190. doi:10.1177/10442073060170030601. ISSN 1044-2073. S2CID 154261924.
  52. ^ Ethridge, Glacia; Dowden, Angel Riddick; Brooks, Michael (2017-12-01). "The Impact of Disability and Type of Crime on Employment Outcomes of African American and Latino Offenders". Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling. 48 (4): 46–53. doi:10.1891/0047-2220.48.4.46. ISSN 0047-2220. S2CID 188565732.
  53. ^ a b Thorpe RJ, Weiss C, Xue QL, Fried L (June 2009). "Transitions among disability levels or death in African American and white older women". The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 64 (6): 670–4. doi:10.1093/gerona/glp010. PMC 2800803. PMID 19228790.
  54. ^ a b c White-Means, Shelley I.; Hammond, Judith M. (December 1993). "Health Insurance and Disability Levels for Older Black and White Women in the South". Journal of Applied Gerontology. 12 (4): 482–496. doi:10.1177/073346489301200406. ISSN 0733-4648. S2CID 58980458.
  55. ^ Kuhlthau, K.; Nyman, R. M.; Ferris, T. G.; Beal, A. C.; Perrin, J. M. (2004-03-01). "Correlates of Use of Specialty Care". Pediatrics. 113 (3): e249 – e255. doi:10.1542/peds.113.3.e249. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 14993584.
  56. ^ Burkhauser RV, Schmeiser MD, Weathers II RR (Jan 2012). "The Importance of Anti-Discrimination and Workers' Compensation Laws on the Provision of Workplace Accommodations Following the Onset of a Disability". Industrial & Labor Relations Review. 65 (1): 161–180. doi:10.1177/001979391206500109. S2CID 154605646.
  57. ^ Darling P (Aug 2007). "Disabilities and the Workplace". Business NH Magazine. 24 (8): 28.
  58. ^ Basnett, Ian (2001), "Health Care Professionals and their Attitudes toward and Decisions Affecting Disabled People", Handbook of Disability Studies, SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. 450–467, doi:10.4135/9781412976251.n19, ISBN 978-0-7619-1652-9, retrieved 2020-11-17
  59. ^ Peña-Guzmán, David M.; Reynolds, Joel Michael (2019). "The Harm of Ableism: Medical Error and Epistemic Injustice". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 29 (3): 205–242. doi:10.1353/ken.2019.0023. ISSN 1086-3249. PMID 31656232. S2CID 204947718.
  60. ^ Ho, Anita (October 2011). "Trusting experts and epistemic humility in disability". International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. 4 (2): 102–123. doi:10.3138/ijfab.4.2.102. S2CID 145754707 – via Project MUSE.
  61. ^ "Disability & Socioeconomic Status". American Psychological Association. Retrieved 19 September 2019.
  62. ^ Siordia C, Ramos AK (2015). "Risk for Disability and Poverty Among Central Asians in the United States". Central Asian Journal of Global Health. 4 (2): 220. doi:10.5195/cajgh.2015.220. PMC 5661206. PMID 29138723.
  63. ^ Siordia C (2015). "Prevalence of Self-Care and Ambulatory Disability in Baby Boom and Generation-X Birth-Cohorts by Intersectional Markers of Social Stratification". Journal of Race and Social Problems. 7 (4): 257–268. doi:10.1007/s12552-015-9155-4. S2CID 142419316.
  64. ^ Siordia C (2015). "A Multilevel Analysis of Mobility Disability in the United States Population: Educational Advantage Diminishes as Race-Ethnicity Poverty Gap Increases". Journal of Studies in Social Sciences. 12 (2): 198–219.
  65. ^ Siordia C, Ramos AK (2015). "Evidence of the 'Hispanic paradox'from the poverty and disability nexus in the Latino farmworker population of the United States". Global Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Health Sciences. 4 (3): 118–24.
  66. ^ a b Getzel EE, Stodden RA, Briel LW (2001). "Pursuing postsecondary education opportunities for individuals with disabilities". In Wehman P (ed.). Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. pp. 247–259. ISBN 978-1-55766-476-1.
  67. ^ Collet-Klingenberg LL (1998). "The reality of best practices in transition: A case study". Exceptional Children. 65 (1): 67–78. doi:10.1177/001440299806500105. S2CID 140951962.
  68. ^ Janiga SJ, Costenbader V (2002). "The transition from high school to postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities: a survey of college service coordinators". Journal of Learning Disabilities. 35 (5): 462–8, 479. doi:10.1177/00222194020350050601. PMID 15490542. S2CID 24586060.
  69. ^ Levinson EM, Ohler DL (1998). "Transition from high school to college for students with learning disabilities: Needs, assessment, and services". High School Journal. 82 (1): 62.
  70. ^ a b c Lee S, Sills M, Oh G. "Disabilities among children and mothers in low-income families (Research in Brief, IWPR Publication #D449)". Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  71. ^ a b Wagner M, Newman L, Cameto R, Garza N, Levine P. "After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities" (PDF). National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2).
  72. ^ a b c d e Cheatham GA, Elliott III W (2012). "The effects of college savings on postsecondary school enrollment rates of students with disabilities". Assets and Education Research Symposium.
  73. ^ Cook BG, Gerber MM, Murphy J (2000). "Backlash against the inclusion of students with learning disabilities in higher education: Implications for transition from post-secondary environments to work". Work. 14 (1): 31–40. PMID 12441538.
  74. ^ Grigal M, Hart D, Weir C (2012). "A survey of postsecondary educational programs for students with intellectual disabilities in the United States". Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. 9 (4): 223–233. doi:10.1111/jppi.12012.
  75. ^ a b Getzel EE, Thoma CA (2008). "Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings". Career Development for Exceptional Individuals. 31 (2): 77–84. doi:10.1177/0885728808317658. S2CID 144688358.
  76. ^ "Social Security - Disability Benefits" (PDF). Social Security Administration. May 2015.
  77. ^ 25 Years Of The ADA, 28 July 2015
  78. ^ Work Incentives - General Information
  79. ^ Cole M, ed. (2005). Education, equality and human rights : issues of gender, race, sexuality, disability and social class (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 0-415-35660-1.
  80. ^ a b c d e f g Aron L, Loprest P (Spring 2012). "Disability and the education system". The Future of Children. 22 (1): 97–122. doi:10.1353/foc.2012.0007. PMID 22550687. S2CID 28098844.
  81. ^ Brizuela G (2011). "Making an "IDEA" a Reality: Providing a Free and Appropriate Public Education for Children with Disabilities Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act". Valparaiso University Law Review. 45. Retrieved 7 August 2015.[permanent dead link‍]
  82. ^ Wilson H, Bialk P, Freeze TB, Freeze R, Lutfiyya ZM (2012). "Heidi's and Philip's stories: transitions to post-secondary education". British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 40 (2): 87. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2012.00746.x.
  83. ^ a b c Greatschools Staff. "IDEA 2004 Close Up: Transition Planning". greatschools.org. Retrieved 28 November 2016.
  84. ^ a b c Claiborne LB, Cornforth S, Gibson A, Smith A (2011). "Supporting students with impairments in higher education: social inclusion or cold comfort?". International Journal of Inclusive Education. 15 (5): 513–527. doi:10.1080/13603110903131747. S2CID 143517247.
  85. ^ a b c d Carney K, Ginsberg S, Lee L, Li A, Orr A, Parks L, Schulte K (Summer 2007). "Meeting the needs of students with disabilities in higher education: how well are we doing?". The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin: 35.
  86. ^ Cameto R, Levine P, Wagner M. "Transition planning for students with disabilities" (PDF). National Longitudinal Transition Study 2. SRI International. Retrieved 28 November 2016.
  87. ^ Strichart SS, Mangrum II CT (1987). "College Opportunities for the Learning Disabled in the United States". European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2 (4): 247–258. doi:10.1080/0885625870020404.
  88. ^ a b Bryan A, Myers K (2006). "Students with Disabilities: Doing What's Right". About Campus. 11 (4): 18. doi:10.1002/abc.175. S2CID 143859878.
  89. ^ Horn L, Berktold J (1999). "Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes". National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Statistical Analysis Report No. 1999-187.
  90. ^ Shaw SF, Scott SS (2003). "New directions in faculty development". Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. 17 (1): 3–9.
  91. ^ Quart, Alissa (March 9, 2023). "Can We Put an End to America's Most Dangerous Myth?". New York Times.
  92. ^ Fair Labor Standards Act 1938 S14 (c)
  93. ^ Diament M (23 August 2012). "Feds Recommended Phasing out Subminimum Wage". Disability Scoop, LLC. Retrieved 31 October 2014.
  94. ^ a b "California Code - Article 5: Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance". Codes.lp.findlaw.com. Retrieved 2015-08-07.
  95. ^ "CAL. INS. CODE § 11628.7 : California Code - Section 11628.7". Codes.lp.findlaw.com. Retrieved 2015-08-07.
  96. ^ "US Labor Department announces final rules to improve the employment of veterans, disabled people". U.S. Department of Labor. 27 August 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
  97. ^ "Answering Your Questions About ADA Accessible Classrooms". Access Advocates. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  98. ^ Ansley, James (2000). "Creating Accessible Schools" (PDF). National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. National Institute of Building Sciences. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 4, 2016. Retrieved March 10, 2016.
  99. ^ "Olmstead v. L. C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999)". JUSTIA U.S. Supreme Court. Retrieved October 26, 2022.
  100. ^ "NEA Accessibility – NEA Office for Accessibility". Nea.gov. Archived from the original on 2 July 2013. Retrieved 25 August 2013.
  101. ^ "Creative Growth". 2013. Retrieved April 30, 2013.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Burch, Susan (July 2009). "(Extraordinary) Bodies of Knowledge: Recent Scholarship in American Disability History". OAH Magazine of History. 23 (3): 29–34. doi:10.1093/maghis/23.3.29. ISSN 0882-228X.
  • Alston, Reginald J.; Russo, Charles J.; Miles, Albert S (1994). "Brown v. Board of Education and the American with Disabilities Act: Vistas of equal educational opportunities for African Americans". Journal of Negro Education. 63 (3). Howard University: 349. doi:10.2307/2967186. ISSN 2167-6437. JSTOR 2967186.
  • Lansing, Michael J. (January 2009). "'Salvaging the Man Power of America': Conservation, Manhood, and Disabled Veterans during World War I". Environmental History. 14: 32–57. doi:10.1093/envhis/14.1.32. ISSN 1084-5453.
  • Longmore, Paul (July 2009). "Making Disability an Essential Part of American History". OAH Magazine of History. 23 (3): 11–15. doi:10.1093/maghis/23.3.11. ISSN 0882-228X.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Disability in the United States.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Disability_in_the_United_States&oldid=1258495032"